|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
European Union Politics, Vol. 1, No. 1,
125-144 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1465116500001001006
© 2000 SAGE Publications
Institutionalist Research on the European Union
A Critical Review
Keith Dowding
London School of Economics and Political Science, UK
This article critically examines the recent wealth of institutionalist rational choice literature on the EU. It appraises the major fault lines and debates. It argues that non-cooperative game theory provides a thorough set of tools to examine the effects of different sorts of institutions upon the powers and limitations of different institutional actors. In certain areas scholars have not fully utilized the models applied to other political systems, but EU scholarship has taken a great leap forward in the past few years. Fully specified models with proper predictions are now being developed, though there is a tendency for modellers to introduce too many new assumptions that make empirical comparison with earlier models problematic, as it is sometimes hard to see which new assumptions are of most import. But we are into a new phase of normal science rational choice institutionalist explanation of the EU.
Key Words: European Union institutionalism rational choice theory

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ciftci
Treaties, Collective Responses and the Determinants of Aggregate Support for European Integration
European Union Politics,
December 1, 2005;
6(4):
469 - 492.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Napel and M. Widgren
Power Measurement as Sensitivity Analysis: A Unified Approach
Journal of Theoretical Politics,
October 1, 2004;
16(4):
517 - 538.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Stokman and R. Thomson
Winners and Losers in the European Union
European Union Politics,
March 1, 2004;
5(1):
5 - 23.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Felsenthal, D. Leech, C. List, and M. Machover
In Defence of Voting Power Analysis: Responses to Albert
European Union Politics,
December 1, 2003;
4(4):
473 - 497.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Mclean
Two Analytical Narratives about the History of the EU
European Union Politics,
December 1, 2003;
4(4):
499 - 506.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Jupille, J. A. Caporaso, and J. T. Checkel
Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union
Comparative Political Studies,
February 1, 2003;
36(1-2):
7 - 40.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kaiser
Alternation, Inclusion and the European Union
European Union Politics,
December 1, 2002;
3(4):
445 - 458.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Mattila and J.-E. Lane
Why Unanimity in the Council?: A Roll Call Analysis of Council Voting
European Union Politics,
February 1, 2001;
2(1):
31 - 52.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|