European Union Politics

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dowding, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
European Union Politics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 125-144 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1465116500001001006
© 2000 SAGE Publications

Other

Institutionalist Research on the European Union

A Critical Review

Keith Dowding

London School of Economics and Political Science, UK

This article critically examines the recent wealth of institutionalist rational choice literature on the EU. It appraises the major fault lines and debates. It argues that non-cooperative game theory provides a thorough set of tools to examine the effects of different sorts of institutions upon the powers and limitations of different institutional actors. In certain areas scholars have not fully utilized the models applied to other political systems, but EU scholarship has taken a great leap forward in the past few years. Fully specified models with proper predictions are now being developed, though there is a tendency for modellers to introduce too many new assumptions that make empirical comparison with earlier models problematic, as it is sometimes hard to see which new assumptions are of most import. But we are into a new phase of normal science rational choice institutionalist explanation of the EU.

Key Words: European Union • institutionalism • rational choice theory


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
European Union PoliticsHome page
S. Ciftci
Treaties, Collective Responses and the Determinants of Aggregate Support for European Integration
European Union Politics, December 1, 2005; 6(4): 469 - 492.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Theoretical PoliticsHome page
S. Napel and M. Widgren
Power Measurement as Sensitivity Analysis: A Unified Approach
Journal of Theoretical Politics, October 1, 2004; 16(4): 517 - 538.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Union PoliticsHome page
F. Stokman and R. Thomson
Winners and Losers in the European Union
European Union Politics, March 1, 2004; 5(1): 5 - 23.
[PDF]


Home page
European Union PoliticsHome page
D. S. Felsenthal, D. Leech, C. List, and M. Machover
In Defence of Voting Power Analysis: Responses to Albert
European Union Politics, December 1, 2003; 4(4): 473 - 497.
[PDF]


Home page
European Union PoliticsHome page
I. Mclean
Two Analytical Narratives about the History of the EU
European Union Politics, December 1, 2003; 4(4): 499 - 506.
[PDF]


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
J. Jupille, J. A. Caporaso, and J. T. Checkel
Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union
Comparative Political Studies, February 1, 2003; 36(1-2): 7 - 40.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Union PoliticsHome page
A. Kaiser
Alternation, Inclusion and the European Union
European Union Politics, December 1, 2002; 3(4): 445 - 458.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Union PoliticsHome page
M. Mattila and J.-E. Lane
Why Unanimity in the Council?: A Roll Call Analysis of Council Voting
European Union Politics, February 1, 2001; 2(1): 31 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]