Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Union Politics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nelsen, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Guth, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Exploring the Gender Gap

Women, Men and Public Attitudes toward European Integration

Brent F. Nelsen

Department of Political Science, Furman University, USA

James L. Guth

Department of Political Science, Furman University, USA

We attempt to further the `normal' study of public opinion in the European Union (EU) by examining the relationship of gender to attitudes toward integration. Using Eurobarometer 42 we demonstrate that a modest gender gap exists, with women being less enthusiastic about the EU than men. We then construct a model to explain male and female attitudes using measures of political distance, women's values, ideology, economic vulnerability and national tradition. Women's attitudes are more sensitive to knowledge about the EU and to economic pessimism than men's, while men's attitudes are determined more by interest in politics, traditionalist values, ideology, and working-class status. We conclude by analyzing interesting differences that emerge when respondents are grouped by `type of welfare state'.

Key Words: economics • gender • public opinion • religion • welfare state

European Union Politics, Vol. 1, No. 3, 267-291 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1465116500001003001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
European Union PoliticsHome page
K. Kaltenthaler, S. Ceccoli, and R. Gelleny
Attitudes toward Eliminating Income Inequality in Europe
European Union Politics, June 1, 2008; 9(2): 217 - 241.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Union PoliticsHome page
C. H. de Vreese and H. G. Boomgaarden
Projecting EU Referendums: Fear of Immigration and Support for European Integration
European Union Politics, March 1, 2005; 6(1): 59 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Union PoliticsHome page
S. Carey
Undivided Loyalties: Is National Identity an Obstacle to European Integration?
European Union Politics, December 1, 2002; 3(4): 387 - 413.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Union PoliticsHome page
B. F. Nelsen, J. L. Guth, and C. R. Fraser
Does Religion Matter?: Christianity and Public Support for the European Union
European Union Politics, June 1, 2001; 2(2): 191 - 217.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cooperation and ConflictHome page
L. HANSEN
An Introduction to Gender and International Relations in a Nordic Context
Cooperation and Conflict, June 1, 2001; 36(2): 147 - 151.
[PDF]