| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Public Opinion, Risk Perceptions, and Genetically Modified Food Regulatory PolicyReassessing the Calculus of Dissent among European CitizensAmerican University, Washington DC, USA, durant{at}american.edu
University of Georgia, Athens, USA, jlegge{at}uga.edu The underlying assumption of multinational corporations and US government campaigns to inform citizens worldwide of the advantages of genetically modified (GM) foods has been straightforward: if citizens better understand GM science and benefits, they will become less wary of GM foods. To test the assumptions of proponents regarding science-based information campaigns, we use heteroskedastic probit analysis to analyze responses to the 1999 Eurobarometer survey. The results suggest that pro-GM food campaigns, directed at enhancing citizens’ understanding of the underlying science and biotechnology of GM food benefits, may not be as effective as GM proponents expect, and may even be counterproductive. The analysis also reveals, however, that support for GM foods is likely to be linked to citizens’ trust in government. Thus, campaigns stressing the regulatory capacity and willingness to protect public health, safety, and the environment, rather than merely leavening citizens’ understanding of the genetic science and biotechnology informing GM foods, may be more effective.
Key Words: biotechnology regulation • genetically modified foods • public opinion • precautionary principle • risk analysis
European Union Politics, Vol. 6, No. 2,
181-200 (2005) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
