This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Garry, J. Articles by Sinnott, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

‘Second-order’ versus ‘Issue-voting’ Effects in EU Referendums

Evidence from the Irish Nice Treaty Referendums

Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland, j.garry{at}qub.ac.uk

Michael Marsh

Trinity College Dublin, Republic of Ireland, mmarsh{at}tcd.ie

Richard Sinnott

University College Dublin, Republic of Ireland, Richard.Sinnott{at}ucd.ie

Are referendums on EU treaties decided by voters’ attitudes to Europe (the ‘issue-voting’ explanation) or by voters’ attitudes to their national political parties and incumbent national government (the ‘second-order election model’ explanation)? In one scenario, these referendums will approximate to deliberative processes that will be decided by people’s views of the merits of European integration. In the other scenario, they will be plebiscites on the performance of national governments. We test the two competing explanations of the determinants of voting in EU referendums using evidence from the two Irish referendums on the Nice Treaty. We find that the issue-voting model outperforms the second-order model in both referendums. However, we also find that issue-voting was particularly important in the more salient and more intense second referendum. Most strikingly, attitudes to EU enlargement were much stronger predictors of vote at Nice 2 than at Nice 1. This finding about the rise in importance of attitudes to the EU points to the importance of campaigning in EU referendums.

Key Words: effective campaigning • issue voting • Nice Treaty • referendums • second-order model

European Union Politics, Vol. 6, No. 2, 201-221 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1465116505051983


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Vatter and J. Bernauer The Missing Dimension of Democracy: Institutional Patterns in 25 EU Member States between 1997 and 2006 European Union Politics, September 1, 2009; 10(3): 335 - 359. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Binzer Hobolt and P. Leblond Is My Crown Better than Your Euro?: Exchange Rates and Public Opinion on the European Single Currency European Union Politics, June 1, 2009; 10(2): 202 - 225. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Lubbers Regarding the Dutch `Nee' to the European Constitution: A Test of the Identity, Utilitarian and Political Approaches to Voting `No' European Union Politics, March 1, 2008; 9(1): 59 - 86. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Crum Party Stances in the Referendums on the EU Constitution: Causes and Consequences of Competition and Collusion European Union Politics, March 1, 2007; 8(1): 61 - 82. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. B. Hobolt How Parties Affect Vote Choice in European Integration Referendums Party Politics, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 623 - 647. [Abstract] [PDF]