|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
European Union Politics, Vol. 8, No. 4,
537-553 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1465116507082813
The Social Choice of EU TreatiesDiscrepancies between Voter Preferences and Referendum Outcomes in Denmark
Mogens K. Justesen
University of Southern Denmark, Denmark, mju{at}sam.sdu.dk
The article applies Social Choice theory to analyse new and so far undiscovered aspects of the Danish referendums on the Maastricht Treaty in 1992 and 1993. The article queries whether the amended Maastricht Treaty adopted in 1993 was, in fact, the most preferred alternative for a majority of Danish voters. A reconstruction of voter preferences regarding the political alternatives in the European Union — the Maastricht Treaty, the amended Maastricht Treaty and the Status Quo — reveals that the amended Maastricht Treaty, despite the fact that it was the Condorcet winner and won the 1993 referendum, may not have been preferred by a majority but was probably the most preferred alternative only for a minority of the electorate.
Key Words: Maastricht Treaty • referendum • social choice • voting
References
- Andersen, Jørgen Goul, Hans Jørgen Nielsen, Steen Sauerberg, Jens Hoff and Torben Worre (1993) Gallup interviews og enquete efter unionsafstemningen 1993. Data material DDA-1839. Odense: Danish Data Archive.
- Brams, Steven J., Marc D. Kilgour and William S. Zwicker (1997) `Voting on Referenda: The Separability Problem and Possible Solutions', Electoral Studies 16(3): 359—77.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Brams, Steven J., Marc D. Kilgour and William S. Zwicker (1998) `The Paradox of Multiple Elections', Social Choice and Welfare 15: 211—36.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Christin, Thomas and Simon Hug (2002) `Referendums and Citizens Support for European Integration', Comparative Political Studies 35(5): 586—617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Department of Taoiseach (2002) Treaty of Nice and Seville Declarations. Dublin. URL: http://www.taoiseach.gov.ie.
- Franklin, Mark (2002) `Learning from the Danish Case: A Comment on Palle Svensson's Critique of the Franklin Thesis', European Journal of Political Research 41: 451—7.
- Franklin, Mark, Michael Marsh and Christopher Wlezien (1994) `Attitudes towards Europe and Referendum Votes: A Response to Siune and Svensson', Electoral Studies 13(2): 117—21.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Franklin, Mark, Cees van der Eijk and Michael Marsh (1995) `Referendum Outcomes and Trust in Government: Public Support for Europe in the Wake of Maastricht', West European Politics 18: 101—17.
- Garry, John, Michael Marsh and Richard Sinnot ( 2005) `"Second-Order" versus "Issue-Voting" Effects in EU Referendums: Evidence from the Irish Nice Treaty Referendums', European Union Politics 6(2): 201—21.
- Gehrlein, William V. (1983) `Condorcet's Paradox', Theory and Decision 15: 161—97.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Hobolt, Sara B. (2006) `How Parties Affect Vote Choice in European Integration Referendums', Party Politics 12(5): 623—47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hobolt, Sara B. (2007) `Taking Cues on Europe? Voter Competence and Party Endorsement in Referendums on European Integration', European Journal of Political Research 46(2): 151—82.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Hug, Simon and Pascal Sciarini (2000) `Referendums on European Integration: Do Institutions Matter in the Voter's Decision?', Comparative Political Studies 33(1): 3—36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter (2001) `An Empirical Example of the Condorcet Paradox in a Large Electorate', Public Choice 107(1—2): 135—45.[CrossRef][ISI]
- McLean, Iain (1988) `Ships That Pass in the Night: Electoral Reform and Social Choice Theory', Political Quarterly 59: 63—71.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Nurmi, Hannu (1997) `Referendum Design: An Exercise in Applied Social Choice Theory', Scandinavian Political Studies 20(1): 33—52.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Riker, William H. (1982) Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Illinois: Waveland Press Inc.
- Riker, William H. and Stephen G. Wright (1989) `Plurality and Runoff and the Number of Candidates', Public Choice 60(2): 155—75.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Saari, Donald G. (2001) Decisions and Elections: Explaining the Unexpected. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Schneider, Gerald and Patricia A. Weitsman (1996) `The Punishment Trap: Integration Referendums as Popularity Contests', Comparative Political Studies 28(4): 582—607.[Abstract]
- Siune, Karen and Palle Svensson ( 1993) `The Danes and the Maastricht Treaty: The Danish EC Referendum of June 1992', Electoral Studies 12(2): 99—111.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Siune, Karen, Ole Tonsgaard and Palle Svensson (1993) Folkeafstemningen om Edinburghaftalen, 18. maj 1993. Data material DDA-1784. Odense: Danish Data Archive.
- Siune, Karen, Palle Svensson and Ole Tonsgaard (1994) `The European Union: The Danes Said "No" in 1992 and "Yes" in 1993: How and Why', Electoral Studies 13(2): 107—16.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Svensson, Palle (2002) `Five Danish Referendums on the European Community and European Union: A Critical Assessment of the Franklin Thesis', European Journal of Political Research 41: 733—50.[CrossRef][ISI]
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
|
