This Article Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Vatter, A. Articles by Bernauer, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Missing Dimension of Democracy

Institutional Patterns in 25 EU Member States between 1997 and 2006

University of Berne, Switzerland, vatter{at}ipw.unibe.ch

Julian Bernauer

University of Konstanz, Germany, julian.bernauer{at}uni-konstanz.de

By compiling data on 12 politico-institutional variables for 25 member states of the European Union over the years 1997—2006, we were able to investigate the emerging patterns of democracy in the European Union. The study addresses the questions of how direct democracy can be incorporated into Lijphart’s (1999) typology of consensus and majoritarian democracy and how empirical democratic patterns are affected by this extension. For the western democracies, three dimensions of democracy were extracted using principal component analysis, with two resembling those found by Lijphart (1999) and a third one being shaped by the interplay between direct democracy and cabinet type. East European democracies tend to have a lower degree of interest group corporatism, weaker central banks, stronger judicial review and stronger direct democracy.

Key Words: consensual and majoritarian democracy • direct democracy • Eastern Europe • EU member states • patterns of democracy

European Union Politics, Vol. 10, No. 3, 335-359 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1465116509337828


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?